October 5, 2010
Chief Rabbinate to hold hearing on rabbi from Haifa area suspected of not removing entire foreskin during brit ceremony. Following discovery, dozens of concerned parents contact experts to check if their children’s circumcision was performed thoroughly. No concern for medical complications
Israel’s Chief Rabbinate suspects that a mohel (ritual circumciser) from the north performed hundreds of circumcisions in recent years that did not comply with Jewish Law. Some of the children circumcised by the rabbi have already undergone surgery to correct the brit, thus rendering it kosher. There is significant concern that others will be forced to undergo a similar procedure.
Ynet learned that the mohel oversight committee instructed the rabbi not to conduct additional circumcisions until the Rabbinate’s hearing on his case, expected to be held this week, is completed.
According to the item published on ladaat.net, suspicions were aroused after a number of senior rabbis from the Haifa area were present at a brit milah performed by L. – a rabbi affiliated with the local Chabad – were surprised to find out that he did not remove the foreskin around the penis, as is required by halacha. The guest rabbis notified the Chief Rabbinate, and word spread throughout the community.
Following these revelations, dozens of concerned parents contacted expert mohels to examine their children’s circumcision. A number of circumcised children even had to undergo a surgical procedure under full anesthesia to correct the botched circumcision. Each such surgical procedure costs thousands of shekels.
The said mohel is well-known and performs hundreds of circumcisions a year. Estimates are that the scandal will likely have implications for thousands of children. For instance, the Chief Rabbinate may decide to summon the circumcised children for an examination whether the circumcisions meet kosher standards.
However, it is important to note that there is no concern of medical complications. The issue is a purely halachic and aesthetic one.
Rabbi Moshe Weisberg, a member of the inter-ministerial committee of the Health Ministry and Religious Affairs ministry for oversight and training of mohels, told Ynet that he does not remember any such instance. “It can happen to anyone because no one is an angel, even if he is a mohel or a doctor,” he explained. “But on such a scale? This is already in the realm of the abnormal.”
Weisberg added that a number of worried parents have already contacted him on the matter. In most cases, he ruled that though their sons’ organ may look “weird,” by his definition, it can be ruled retrospectively that the brit milah was kosher. However, in some cases, he recommended that the corrective surgery procedure be performed.
“If it were my son, I wouldn’t think twice,” he said. Other mohels and doctors from the north have also performed the “corrections” on a number of children.
N., a haredi parent of a three-year-old circumcised by L., told Ynet of the sense of panic and subsequent meeting with Rabbi Weisberg. “He is known as one of the foremost experts in our community. When he removed my child’s pants he just said, ‘Oy, oy, oy.’ My heart sank. I almost breathed my last breath. Fortunately for us, it was okay in the end, and he said we don’t need a correction.”
N. said that he specifically chose L. to perform the brit milah because he heard that babies don’t cry when he does the procedure. Now, three years later, he understands why.
“Whenever I bathed the children, I saw there was something weird with him, but I didn’t make a big deal about it,” he added. “I told myself it could just be a difference between one child and the next. Only when my wife told me about the Rabbinate’s investigation did the other shoe drop.”
Despite this, N. emphasized that the said mohel is “a God-fearing adherent,” and that the botch, if there was one, was done innocently.
Head of the Chief Rabbinate’s brit milah department Rabbi Moshe Morsiano told Ynet, “There is no medical damage, but it is a halachic matter. Circumcision is a commandment and must be done in its entirety. There is concern here that this was not the case. This is a serious, well-known, and highly regarded man who apparently made a mistake.”