<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Norman G. Finkelstein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com</link>
	<description>Official Website</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>PRINCIPLED AND REASONABLE</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/principled-and-reasonable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/principled-and-reasonable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Israel-Palestine Conflict]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QyvRXXj_OBk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QyvRXXj_OBk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/principled-and-reasonable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basically I agree with this</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/basically-i-agree-with-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/basically-i-agree-with-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  
    
      
        The Boycott Israel Movement Needs to Rethink Tactics
        by Uri   Avnery, August 30, 2010 
        http://original.antiwar.com/avnery/2010/08/29/the-boycott-israel-movement-needs-to-rethink-tactics/
    [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="gmail_quote">
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff">
    <div><font face="Arial" size="2">
      <div>
        <p>The Boycott Israel Movement Needs to Rethink Tactics</p>
        <div>by <a title="Posts by Uri Avnery" href="http://original.antiwar.com/author/avnery/" target="_blank"><font color="#990000">Uri   Avnery</font></a>, August 30, 2010 </div>
        <div><a href="http://original.antiwar.com/avnery/2010/08/29/the-boycott-israel-movement-needs-to-rethink-tactics/" target="_blank">http://original.antiwar.com/avnery/2010/08/29/the-boycott-israel-movement-needs-to-rethink-tactics/</a></div>
      </div>
      <div>
        <p>Channel 10, one of Israel’s three TV channels, aired a report this week that   surely frightened a lot of viewers. Its title was “Who Is Organizing the   Worldwide Hatred of Israel Movement?” and its subject was the dozens of groups   in various countries which are conducting a vigorous propaganda campaign for the   Palestinians and against Israel.</p>
        <p>The activists interviewed, both male and female, young and old – quite a   number of them Jews – demonstrate at supermarkets against the products of the   settlements and/or of Israel in general, organize mass meetings, make speeches,   mobilize trade unions, file lawsuits against Israeli politicians and generals. </p>
        <p>According to the report, the various groups use similar methods, but there is   no central leadership. It even quotes (without attribution, of course) the title   of <a href="http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1281216042" target="_blank"><font color="#990000">one of my recent articles</font></a>, “The Protocols of the Elders   of Anti-Zion,” and it, too, asserts that there is no such thing. Indeed, there   is no need for a worldwide organization, it says, because all over the place   there is a spontaneous surge of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli feeling.   Recently, following the “Cast Lead” operation and the flotilla affair, this   process has gathered momentum.</p>
        <p>In many places, the report discloses, there are now red-green coalitions:   cooperation between leftist human-rights bodies and local groups of Muslim   immigrants.</p>
        <p>The conclusion of the story: this is a great danger to Israel and we must   mobilize against it before it is too late.</p>
        <p>The first question that arose in my mind was: what impact is this report   going to have on the average Israeli?</p>
        <p>I wish I could be sure that it will cause him or her to think again about the   viability of the occupation. As one of the activists interviewed said: the   Israelis must be brought to understand that the occupation has a price tag.</p>
        <p>I wish I believed that this would be the reaction of most Israelis. However,   I am afraid that the effect could be very different.</p>
        <p>As the jolly song of the ’70s goes: “The whole world is against us / That’s   not so terrible, we shall overcome. / For we, too, don’t give a damn / For them.   // … We have learned this song / From our forefathers / And we shall also sing   it / To our sons. / And the grandchildren of our grandchildren will sing it /   Here, in the Land of Israel, / And everybody who is against us / Can go to   hell.”</p>
        <p>The writer of this song, Yoram Taharlev (“pure of heart”) has succeeded in   expressing a basic Jewish belief, crystallized during the centuries of   persecution in Christian Europe, which reached its climax in the Holocaust.   Every Jewish child learns in school that when 6 million Jews were murdered, the   entire world looked on and didn’t lift a finger to save them.</p>
        <p>This is not quite true. Many tens of thousands of non-Jews risked their lives   and the lives of their families in order to save Jews – in Poland, Denmark,   France, Holland, and other countries, even in Germany itself. We all know about   people who were saved this way – like former Supreme Court President Aharon   Barak, who as a child was smuggled out of the ghetto by a Polish farmer, and   Minister Yossi Peled, who was hidden for years by a Catholic Belgian family.   Only a few of these largely unsung heroes were cited as “Righteous among the   Nations” by Yad Vashem. (Between us, how many Israelis in a similar situation   would risk their lives and the lives of their children in order to save a   foreigner?)</p>
        <p>But the belief that “the whole world is against us” is rooted deep in our   national psyche. It enables us to ignore the world reaction to our behavior. It   is very convenient. If the entire world hates us anyhow, the nature of our   deeds, good or bad, doesn’t really matter. They would hate Israel even if we   were angels. The goyim are just anti-Semitic.</p>
        <p>It is easy to show that this is also untrue. The world loved us when we   founded the state of Israel and defended it with our blood. A day after the   Six-Day War, the whole world applauded us. They loved us when we were David,   they hate us when we are Goliath.</p>
        <p>This does not convince the world-against-us people. Why is there no worldwide   movement against the atrocities of the Russians in Chechnya or the Chinese in   Tibet? Why only against us? Why do the Palestinians deserve more sympathy than   the Kurds in Turkey?</p>
        <p>One could answer that since Israel demands special treatment in all other   matters, we are measured by special standards when it comes to the occupation   and the settlements. But logic doesn’t matter. It’s the national myths that   count.</p>
        <p>Yesterday, Israel’s third largest newspaper, <em>Ma’ariv</em>, published a   story about our ambassador to the United Nations under the revealing headline:   “Behind enemy lines.”</p>
        <p>I remember one of the clashes I had with Golda Meir in the Knesset, after the   beginning of the settlement enterprise and the angry reactions throughout the   world. As now, people put all the blame on our faulty “explaining.” The Knesset   held a general debate.</p>
        <p>Speaker after speaker declaimed the usual clichés: the Arab propaganda is   brilliant, our “explaining” is beneath contempt. When my turn came, I said: It’s   not the fault of the “explaining.” The best “explaining” in the world cannot   “explain” the occupation and the settlements. If we want to gain the sympathy of   the world, it’s not our words that must change, but our actions.</p>
        <p>Throughout the debate, Golda Meir – as was her wont – stood at the door of   the plenum hall, chain-smoking. Summing up, she answered every speaker in turn,   ignoring my speech. I thought that she had decided to boycott me, when – after a   dramatic pause – she turned in my direction. “Deputy Avnery thinks that they   hate us because of what we do. He does not know the goyim. The goyim love the   Jews when they are beaten and miserable. They hate the Jews when they are   victorious and successful.” If clapping were allowed in the Knesset, the whole   house would have burst into thunderous applause.</p>
        <p>There is a danger that the current worldwide protest will meet the same   reaction: that the Israeli public will unite against the evil goyim, instead of   uniting against the settlers.</p>
        <p>Some of the protest groups could not care less. Their actions are not   addressed to the Israeli public, but to international opinion.</p>
        <p>I don’t mean the anti-Semites, who are trying to hitch a ride on this   movement. They are a negligible force. Neither do I mean those who believe that   the creation of the state of Israel was a historical mistake to start with, and   that it should be dismantled.</p>
        <p>I mean all the idealists who wish to put an end to the suffering of the   Palestinian people and the stealing of their land by the settlers, and to help   them to found the free state of Palestine.</p>
        <p>These aims can be achieved only through peace between Palestine and Israel.   And such a peace can come about only if the majority of Palestinians and the   majority of Israelis support it. Outside pressure will not suffice.</p>
        <p>Anyone who understands this must be interested in a worldwide protest that   does not push the Israeli population into the arms of the settlers, but, on the   contrary, isolates the settlers and turns the general public against them.</p>
        <p>How can this be achieved?</p>
        <hr />
        <p>The first thing is to clearly differentiate between the boycott of the   settlements and a general boycott of Israel. The TV report suggested that many   of the protesters do not see the border between the two. It showed a middle-aged   British woman in a supermarket, waving some fruit over her head and shouting,   “These come from a settlement!” Then it showed a demonstration against the Ahava   cosmetic products that are extracted from the Palestinian part of the Dead Sea.   But immediately after, there came a call for a boycott of all Israeli products.   Perhaps many of the protesters – or the editors of the film – are not clear   about the difference.</p>
        <p>The Israeli Right also blurs this distinction. For example: a recent bill in   the Knesset wants to punish those who support a boycott on the products of   Israel, including – as it states explicitly – the products of the   settlements.</p>
        <p>If the world protest is clearly focused on the settlements, it will indeed   cause many Israelis to realize that there is a clear line between the legitimate   state of Israel and the illegitimate occupation.</p>
        <p>That is also true for other parts of the story. For example: the initiative   to boycott the Caterpillar company, whose monstrous bulldozers are a major   weapon of the occupation. When the heroic peace activist Rachel Corrie was   crushed to death under one of them, the company should have stopped all further   supplies unless assured that they would not be used for repression.</p>
        <p>As long as suspected war criminals are not brought to justice in Israel   itself, one cannot object to the initiatives to prosecute them abroad.</p>
        <p>After this week’s decision by the main Israeli theaters to perform in the   settlements, it will be logical to boycott them abroad. If they are so keen to   make money in Ariel, they can’t complain about losing money in Paris and   London.</p>
        <hr />
        <p>The second thing is the connection between these groups and the Israeli   public.</p>
        <p>Today a large majority of Israelis say that they want peace and are ready to   pay the price, but that, unfortunately, the Arabs don’t want peace. The   mainstream peace camp, which could once bring hundreds of thousands onto the   street, is in a state of depression. It feels isolated. Among other things, its   once close connection with the Palestinians, which was established at the time   of Yasser Arafat after Oslo, has become very loose. So have relations with the   protest forces abroad.</p>
        <p>If people of goodwill want to speed up the end of the occupation, they must   support the peace activists in Israel. They should build a close connection with   them, break the conspiracy of silence against them in the world media, publicize   their courageous actions, and organize more and more international events in   which Palestinian and Israeli peace activists will be present side by side. It   would also be nice if for every 10 billionaires who finance the extreme Right in   Israel, there were at least one millionaire supporting action in pursuit of   peace.</p>
        <p>All this becomes impossible if there is a call for a boycott on all Israelis,   irrespective of their views and actions, and Israel is presented as a monolithic   monster. This picture is not only false, it is extremely harmful.</p>
        <p>Many of the activists who appear in this report arouse respect and   admiration. So much good will! So much courage! If they point their activities   in the right direction, they can do a lot of good – good for the Palestinians,   and good for us Israelis, too.</p>
      </div>
    </font></div>
  </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/basically-i-agree-with-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD LIVES!  (click here for history of the Underground Railroad)</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-underground-railroad-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-underground-railroad-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  
     Jonathan Cook
      Global Research
      Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:12 CDT 
  
  



  
    © AP / Muhammed Muheisen
      The Wall must Fall
  
  Nearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article-header">
  <div class="article-info">
    <p> Jonathan Cook<br />
      Global Research<br />
      Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:12 CDT </p>
  </div>
  <!-- end article-info -->
</div>
<!-- end article-header -->
<div class="article-body">
  <div class="article-image to-right"><a href="http://www.sott.net/image/image/s2/42996/full/AP_israel_crackdown_liberal_je.jpg" rel="ibox&#038;ignore_target=true" target="_blank" title="© AP / Muhammed Muheisen"><img src="http://www.sott.net/image/image/s2/42996/medium/AP_israel_crackdown_liberal_je.jpg" alt="" title="Click to enlarge" border="0"></a>
    <div class="image-caption"><span class="tiny">© AP / Muhammed Muheisen</span><br />
      <span class="caption">The Wall must Fall</span></div>
  </div>
  Nearly  600 Israelis have signed up for a campaign of civil disobedience,  vowing to risk jail to smuggle Palestinian women and children into  Israel for a brief taste of life outside the occupied West Bank. <br />
  <br />
  The Israelis say they have been inspired by the example of  Ilana Hammerman, a writer who is threatened with prosecution after  publishing an article in which she admitted breaking the law to bring  three Palestinian teenagers into Israel for a day out. <br />
  <br />
  Ms Hammerman said she wanted to give the young women, who had  never left the West Bank, &#8220;some fun&#8221; and a chance to see the  Mediterranean for the first time. <br />
  <br />
  Her story has shocked many Israelis and led to a police  investigation after right-wing groups called for her to be tried for  security offences. <br />
  <br />
  It is illegal to transport Palestinians through checkpoints  into Israel without a permit, which few can obtain. If tried and found  guilty, Ms Hammerman could be fined and face up to two years in jail. <br />
  <br />
  But Israelis joining the campaign say they will not be put off by threats of imprisonment. <br />
  <br />
  Last month, a group of 11 Israeli women joined Ms Hammerman in  repeating her act of civil disobedience, driving a dozen Palestinian  women and four children, including a baby, through a checkpoint into  Israel. <br />
  <br />
  The Israeli women say they are planning mass &#8220;smugglings&#8221; of Palestinians into Israel over the coming weeks. <br />
  <br />
  &#8220;The Palestinians who join us are mainly looking to have a good  time after years of confinement under the occupation, but for us what  is most important is our act of defiance,&#8221; said Ofra Lyth, who helped  establish an online forum of supporters after attending a speech by Ms  Hammerman. <br />
  <br />
  &#8220;We want to overturn this immoral law that gives rights to  Jews to move freely around while keeping Palestinians imprisoned in  their towns and villages,&#8221; she said, referring to regulations that bar  most Palestinians in the occupied territories from entering Israel, and  Israelis from assisting them. Exceptions are made for Palestinians with  permits, sometimes issued for a medical emergency or to some labourers  with security clearance. <br />
  <br />
  For the Palestinian women, though, it is not about making a statement or defying an unjust law, said Ms Lyth. <br />
  <br />
  &#8220;The Palestinian women tell us: &#8216;Go ahead and make your  political point, but for us we&#8217;re breaking the law so that we can enjoy  ourselves and remember how life was before the checkpoints and the  wall.&#8217; One woman told me: &#8216;I just want to be able to breathe again&#8217;.&#8221; <br />
  <br />
  For Palestinians in the West Bank, it is not often easy to  breathe. The territory is home to a growing population of 300,000 Jews  in more than 100 settlements. The settlers are able to drive into  Israel on roads that the army oversees with checkpoints. <br />
  <br />
  It was through one such settler crossing, near Beitar Ilit,  south of Jerusalem, that Ms Hammerman took the three Palestinian  teenagers this year. <br />
  <br />
  For their protection, she has not identifed the young women or  the West Bank village where they live. She refers to the women as Aya,  Lin and Yasmin. They, too, could face jail for breaking the law. <br />
  <br />
  In Ms Hammerman&#8217;s article, published in the<em> Haaretz</em> newspaper in May, she admitted that she was aware her actions were illegal. <br />
  <br />
  She told the women, who were 18 and 19, to take off their  hijabs for the day and dress in western-style clothes to avoid  attracting attention from soldiers at the checkpoint. She also taught  them an easy Hebrew phrase &#8212; Hakull beseder, or &#8220;Everything is okay&#8221;  &#8212; in case a soldier spoke to them. <br />
  <br />
  She then took them on a tour of Tel Aviv, visiting the city&#8217;s  university, a museum, a shopping mall and the beach, which she noted  none of them had ever seen even though it is only about 40km from their  village. <br />
  <br />
  Gisha, an Israeli human rights group, said Israel introduced a  permit system to limit Palestinian movement out of the West Bank in the  early 1990s - about the time the young women were born. <br />
  <br />
  Ms Hammerman wrote that the only dangerous moment during the  trip was when a plain-clothes policeman stopped them and asked for the  women&#8217;s identity cards. Ms Hammerman lied to the officer, telling him  that the women were Palestinians from East Jerusalem and therefore  entitled to enter Israel. <br />
  <br />
  In June, Yehuda Weinstein, the attorney general, was reported  to have approved a police investigation of Ms Hammerman after a settler  organisation, the Legal Forum for the Land of Israel, complained. <br />
  <br />
  The ranks of Ms Hammerman&#8217;s supporters have swollen since the group placed an advertisement, titled &#8220;We refuse to obey&#8221;, in <em>Haaretz </em>this  month. The ad said the group was &#8220;acting in the spirit of Martin Luther  King&#8221;, the US civil rights leader, and demanded that Palestinians be  treated as &#8220;human beings, not terrorists&#8221;. <br />
  <br />
  Over the past week, the online forum has attracted more than  590 Israelis signing up to repeat Ms Hammerman&#8217;s act of civil  disobedience. <br />
  <br />
  &#8220;That has really surprised and encouraged me,&#8221; she said. &#8220;I  did not realise there were so many other Israelis who have had enough  of this outrageous law.&#8221; <br />
  <br />
  Still, the coverage of Ms Hammerman and her supporters in the  Israeli media has been largely hostile. During a television interview  last week, she was accused of endangering Israelis with her trips. The  show&#8217;s host, Yaron London, asked whether she had inspected the  Palestinian women&#8217;s underclothes for explosives before allowing them  into her car. <br />
  <br />
  She will will not be deterred, though. She said the group had  discussed future trips for Palestinians, including taking them to pray  at al-Aqsa, the mosque in Jerusalem that has been inaccessible to most  Palestinians for at least a decade, and visits to Palestinian relatives  they cannot see in Jerusalem and Israel. <br />
  <br />
  &#8220;We need to get Israelis meeting Palestinians again, having  fun with them and seeing that they are human beings with the same  rights as us.&#8221; <br />
  <br />
  She said her immediate goal was to kick-start a discussion  among Israelis about the legality and morality of Israel&#8217;s laws and  challenge the public&#8217;s &#8220;blind obedience&#8221; to authority. <br />
  <br />
  Ms Lyth added that the Palestinian women &#8220;who have gone on our  trips are the heroes of their village. They and their families know  they are taking a big risk in breaking the law, but harassment is part  of their daily lives anyway&#8221;. <br />
  <br />
  Till now the trips have been restricted to smuggling  Palestinian women and children only, said Ms Hammerman. &#8220;It is harder  to bring men in without being discovered and the authorities would be  likely to treat Palestinian men much more harshly if they were caught.&#8221; <br />
  <br />
  <em>Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel.  His latest books are &#8220;Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran  and the Plan to Remake the Middle East&#8221; (Pluto Press) and &#8220;Disappearing  Palestine: Israel&#8217;s Experiments in Human Despair&#8221; (Zed Books). His  website is www.jkcook.net. <br />
  <br />
    A version of this article originally appeared in <a href="http://www.thenational.ae" target="_blank">The National</a>, published in Abu Dhabi.</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-underground-railroad-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;PEACE&#8221; &#8220;PROCESS&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/peace-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/peace-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Israel-Palestine Conflict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the resuscitation of the ‘peace process’

  
  
    “Peace process? What peace process? That’s so nineties. After 18 years, don’t they feel silly…
    There are only two scenarios. The optimistic one is more of the  same. The pessimistic one is it’s going to get worse.” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="nlp-blog-title">On the resuscitation of the ‘peace process’</h3>
<div class="nlp-blog-body triple-column margin">
  <div class="nlp-blog-intro"></div>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Peace process? What peace process? That’s so nineties. After 18 years, don’t they feel silly…</p>
    <p>There are only two scenarios. The optimistic one is more of the  same. The pessimistic one is it’s going to get worse.” – Ahmad Aweidah,  head of the Palestinian Stock Exchange </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Ah, the ‘peace process’. Like Shimon Peres, Big Brother and Ernie  the Giant Chicken, it just won’t fucking die already. What was  particularly striking about the announcement of its latest iteration, <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?ID=185447" target="_blank">due to kick-off next week</a>,  was how little anyone cared. In the stream of public and media  consciousness, even in Israel, it barely caused a ripple. Apart from  the real <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/opinion/27indyk.html?_r=1" target="_blank">die-hards</a>, no one can even muster the energy to <em>pretend</em> anymore. Whereas three years ago Bush officials were having to actively  downplay hopes about the “Annapolis summit” – which was <em><a href="http://zcommunications.org/yes-bush-is-naked-what-of-it-by-tony-karon" target="_blank">not</a></em> a “peace conference”, you’ll recall, and which would <em><a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Difficult-prospective-for-today%E2%80%99s-meeting-between-Abbas-and-Olmert-10457.html" target="_blank">not</a></em> produce a “declaration of principles” but rather a “declaration of  interests” – now US officials are having to make absurd promises, like  claiming that a peace agreement will be reached <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3944645,00.html" target="_blank">within a year</a>, just to get people to pay attention. <a href="http://reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/MUMA-88K2LG?OpenDocument&#038;rc=3&#038;cc=pse" target="_blank">Palestinians</a> and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/27/peace-talks-tel-aviv-bubble-israel" target="_blank">Israelis</a> are united in dismissing the talks as an irrelevency.If the ‘peace process’ is indeed redolent of a <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1951829,00.html" target="_blank">“soap opera”</a>, it most resembles the relaunch of <a href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/news/a10638/crossroads-axed-shortly-after-relaunch.html" target="_blank">Crossroads</a>, greeted with a collective shrug and an uneasy feeling that, looking back, the original wasn’t much cop either.</p>
  <p>It’s not surprising that the Obama administration is attempting to  play up the talks, given how much effort it expended in realising them.  Not, as you might expect, because the Israeli government was unwilling  to play ball. On the contrary: Netanyahu has been pushing for these  talks for months. Rather, the weight of US power was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/21/world/middleeast/21diplo.html" target="_blank">brought to bear</a> on the Palestinian Authority, as usual. Abbas, clinging to what scraps of nationalist dignity he had left, had <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/abbas-no-peace-talks-without-full-settlement-freeze-1.282997" target="_blank">insisted</a> that no talks would take place without an agreement from Israel to extend its (<a href="http://coteret.com/2010/05/09/maariv-feature-documents-settlement-freeze-sham/" target="_blank">non-existent</a>)  freeze on settlement construction. He also called for a predetermined  schedule for negotiations, and for any future peace talks to be based  on the principle of an Israeli withdrawal to its legal borders – that  is, on the international political and legal consensus. As the Israeli <a href="http://reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/MCOI-88PG46?OpenDocument&#038;rc=3&#038;cc=pse" target="_blank">Institute for National Security Studies</a> reports, “renewal of the talks was made possible following heavy  pressure leveled by the United States on Abbas to concede” all of these  demands. Abbas has been duly attacked by Palestinians for this  “surrender”, from within his own party as well as Hamas, but  ultimately, the survival of the PA rests not on internal support but on  international backing. Its capitulation was thus <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/mess-report/mess-report-plo-must-cease-climbing-trees-too-high-to-climb-down-1.309410" target="_blank">inevitable</a>:</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“In spite of opposition at home, Abbas knows that the  bottom line is he could survive different opinions but not an end to  economic aid.” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><em>Ha’aretz</em> is correct, then, to report the announcement of the talks as a <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/analysis-netanyahu-has-won-for-now-1.309294" target="_blank">victory for Netanyahu</a>. But why was the Israeli Prime Minister so keen on them in the first place?</p>
  <p><strong>Negotiations about what?</strong></p>
  <p>We can discount his own <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/netanyahu-we-can-reach-a-peace-that-will-last-for-generations-1.310837" target="_blank">explanation</a> – that the Israeli government seeks a genuine, stable peace settlement  – immediately. Netanyahu’s position hasn’t changed from the one <a href="http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20090607.htm" target="_blank">elaborated</a> by his communications director back in 1996: Israel will retain control over the West Bank, and</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>Palestinians can call whatever fragments of Palestine  are left to them &#8220;a state&#8221; if they like—or they can call them &#8220;fried  chicken&#8221;. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>What this “fried chicken” will consist of is clear from Netanyahu’s pronouncements – he <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-rejects-peace-talks-based-on-1967-borders-1.307430?localLinksEnabled=false" target="_blank">rejects the ‘67 borders</a> as a basis for negotiations, <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/netanyahu-israel-will-never-cede-jordan-valley-1.266329" target="_blank">insists</a> on retaining control over the Jordan Valley, <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-israel-will-never-share-jerusalem-with-palestinians-1.261276" target="_blank">promises</a> that a “united Jerusalem” will remain Israel’s eternal capital and has <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2010/08/the-borders-of-the-palestinian-state-come-into-focus.html" target="_blank">indicated</a> that all the major ‘settlement blocs’ will remain annexed to Israel.  (Netanyahu’s rejectionism is mild compared to that of some of his  colleagues: the ‘spiritual leader’ of Shas, a member of Israel’s  governing coalition, yesterday <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/erekat-israeli-religious-figure-urging-genocide-of-palestinians-1.310876" target="_blank">called for genocide</a> against “these evil people”, the Palestinians.) More importantly,  however, it is clear from Israel’s actions on the ground. July and  August saw a <a href="http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/08/19/israel-new-peak-arbitrary-razing-palestinian-homes" target="_blank">“new peak”</a> in the destruction of Palestinian homes – in July alone, 550  Palestinians lost their homes or livelihoods. In just one incident, the  Israeli military destroyed <a href="http://reliefweb.int/rw/RWFiles2010.nsf/FilesByRWDocUnidFilename/VVOS-88PPGE-full_report.pdf/$File/full_report.pdf" target="_blank">“almost the entire Palestinian village of Al Farisiye in the Jordan Valley”</a>,  consistent with long-term Israeli objectives for the area, described  above. The ‘Civil Administration’ has confirmed that it “received  instructions from the Ministry of Defense to step up demolitions of  Palestinian structures throughout Area C in the near future”. The  Israeli government is refusing to freeze settlement expansion for the  duration of the talks, and construction continues on the annexation  wall, which functions as a <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/shimon-peres-sharon-said-that-he-basically-agrees-with-my-ideas-but-thinks-im-in-a-bit-of-a-hurry-588968.html" target="_blank">“political fence”</a> (Shimon Peres) with “implications” for Israel’s <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/sharon-sees-wall-as-israels-new-border-517787.html" target="_blank">“future border”</a> (Tzipi Livni). </p>
  <p>In other words, a ‘peace settlement’ for the Israeli government  would represent an acceptance by Palestinians of the plan Israel has  been <a href="http://lawrenceofcyberia.blogs.com/news/2008/08/treading-water.html" target="_blank">pushing since the occupation began</a>, a formalisation of what it has <a href="http://lawrenceofcyberia.blogs.com/photos/maps/un_westbankmap_2007.html" target="_blank">already implemented</a> on the ground, by force. In <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/what-happens-when-the-talks-fail-1.310470" target="_blank">short</a>,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“The gap between the positions held by most coalition  members, including Netanyahu’s inner cabinet of seven, and those held  by the Palestinians is evident - and nothing has happened to indicate  it has narrowed”. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>The Israeli government continues to reject the international  consensus two-state settlement, which is the minimum any Palestinian  leader – even Mahmoud Abbas – can accept. In these circumstances, one  can only ask, along with (fucked clock) <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/20/AR2010082004682.html" target="_blank">George Will</a>, “negotiations about what?”</p>
  <p><strong>Obama</strong></p>
  <p> “Aha!”, supporters of the ‘peace process’ might say at this point.  “You’re forgetting about the Obama factor!” Or trying to, at any rate.  The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/21/AR2009022100139.html" target="_blank">‘Obama factor’</a>,  always a somewhat mystical affair, is even less grounded in evidence  here than usual. His administration’s record in Palestine differs from  his predecessors in precisely two ways. First, US military aid to  Israel has <a href="http://www.endtheoccupation.org/article.php?id=2002" target="_blank">significantly increased</a> and military ties have <a href="http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/07/144794.htm" target="_blank">deepened</a>. As recently as April the Pentagon agreed to sell Israel three Hercules aircraft in <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/exclusive-despite-row-u-s-and-israel-sign-massive-arms-deal-1.266650" target="_blank">an arms deal</a> worth nearly a quarter of a billion dollars. Second, it has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/us/01prexy.html?_r=2&#038;fta=y" target="_blank">ruled out</a> imposing significant material pressure on Israel to reverse, or even moderate, its rejectionism. As the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://warincontext.org/2010/03/22/squeeze-israel-by-cutting-us-aid-not-likely/" target="_blank">reports</a>,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“The diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Israel has  sent a tremor through their alliance, but one key part of the bond  seems virtually untouchable: the roughly $3 billion a year in U.S.  military aid” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>—which ought to raise questions about the sincerity of said  “diplomatic crisis”. “There has been no serious talk of using aid as a  club”, the <em>Post</em> continued. This is critical, because while the  US backs the occupation, Israel has no incentive to end it. As Alon  Liel, director general of Israel’s Foreign Ministry while Barak was PM, <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/don-t-worry-there-won-t-be-peace-1.310772" target="_blank">explains</a>,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“it’s not possible for the strongest kid and the weakest  kid in the neighborhood to conduct talks on reconciliation and  friendship when the talks are based on arm wrestling. It’s absolutely  clear who will win.” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Particularly when the “strongest kid” is backed by the global military superpower. </p>
  <p>It is true that there have been mumblings of discontent within the US establishment recently – witness, for instance, <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2248144" target="_blank">Gen. Petraeus’s averral</a> that perceptions of US “favouritism for Israel” damage “our interests”  – but this is nothing new, and they show little sign of becoming  dominant. </p>
  <p><strong>Talks as formaldehyde</strong></p>
  <p>Why, then, have the US and Israel insisted on the resumption of  talks, given the opposition of both to a two-state settlement? For  Obama, as one Arab diplomat has <a href="http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1013/fr1.htm" target="_blank">noted</a>,  the announcement of talks allows him “to claim some kind of success,  especially ahead of the upcoming elections and at a time when his  popularity in the polls does not seem to be all that good”. One of  Obama’s principle virtues for US power – what made him distinct from  McCain and Bush – is his ability to put a human face on American  hegemony, to consolidate the US position and try to repair some of the  damage caused by Bush-era adventurism. In the Middle East that meant <a href="http://heathlander.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/obamas-bold-vision/" target="_blank">being seen to empathise</a> with regional concerns, and appearing to do something to resolve the  Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To that end he engaged in a highly  visible campaign to pressure ‘both parties’ (in fact, the Palestinians)  to resume talks – without, as discussed above, acting to ensure that  there was anything substantive to talk <em>about</em>.</p>
  <p>For Israel, meanwhile, the talks represent the latest manifestation of <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n16/henry-siegman/the-great-middle-east-peace-process-scam" target="_blank">“the most spectacular deception in modern diplomatic history”</a>, a “fiction that has served primarily to provide cover for its systematic confiscation of Palestinian land”. As the <em>Financial Times</em> chief international affairs correspondent <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/de207f42-b08a-11df-8c04-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">writes</a>,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“the Middle East peace process long ago turned into a  tortured charade of pure process while events on the ground – in  particular the relentless and strategic Israeli colonisation of  occupied Palestinian land – pull in the opposite direction to peace.  “We have all been colluding in a gigantic confidence trick,” is how one  Arab minister puts it, “and here we go again”. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>As with the “road map”, an agreement signed with much fanfare in  2003 and then obliterated a day later, when the Israeli government <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-s-road-map-reservations-1.8935" target="_blank">entered 14 “reservations”</a> that rendered the entire process meaningless, and as with the more recent ‘Annapolis process’, which proceeded in tandem with <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ilXaWHtAxunmONxW07nEArIJA3vA" target="_blank">a 60% increase in settlement construction</a>, the point is simply to ensure that <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/negotiations-forever-1.257971" target="_blank">“we are forever engaged in some negotiations”</a>. This strategy is nothing new. As Yossi Sarid <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/they-ve-all-been-yitzhak-shamir-1.258428" target="_blank">recalls</a>, “they used to say about Yitzhak Shamir that he conducted peace negotiations with our neighbors as long as they never ended”. <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/policy-in-no-man-s-land-1.231885" target="_blank">“There are no sacred dates”</a>, insisted Rabin. As veteran diplomatic correspondent <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/policy-in-no-man-s-land-1.231885" target="_blank">Aluf Benn</a> wrote of the ‘Annapolis process’,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Conducting high-level talks between Israel and the  Palestinian Authority; Israel’s willingness to discuss the principles  for ending the conflict; and gestures such as the release of prisoners  are in themselves sufficient to remove international pressure on Israel  to withdraw from the territories and to end the occupation.</p>
    <p>At the same time, as long as it’s all talk and there are no  agreements or decisions that involve the evacuation of territories and  the settlements, there is no internal pressure on the government  either”. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Israel’s typical strategy, once a new round of fraudulent  negotiations commences, is to declare that “security” and  “institutional” issues must be agreed upon (and even implemented)  before any ‘final status’ issues – borders, Jerusalem, the refugees –  are discussed, and to focus on red herring issues like demanding  recognition of Israel as a “Jewish state”. This explains the convoluted  structure of Oslo and the Road Map, for instance. The effect of this is  to bog the whole process down in minutiae and defer discussion of  Palestinian political claims to an unspecified point in the distant  future. And sure enough, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i7iEOz2T-RTgQUZlK2dKC0-tJlmA" target="_blank">right on cue</a>:</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that  Palestinian recognition of Israel as the Jewish homeland is chief among  essential components for a peace deal, days ahead of renewed  negotiations.” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-demands-talks-focus-on-security-issues-before-borders-1.309411" target="_blank">and</a></p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Netanyahu says he plans to focus on security  arrangements before addressing final borders … Netanyahu said during  his meetings he wants to discuss security issues with the Palestinians  first; only then would the two sides focus on borders of a future  Palestinian state.” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>This strategy of endlessly drawn-out negotiations recalls Dov Weisglass’s <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/top-pm-aide-gaza-plan-aims-to-freeze-the-peace-process-1.136686" target="_blank">account</a> of the objectives behind the Gaza “disengagement”, which was designed,  he explained, to put the ‘peace process’ in “formaldehyde”. This  formulation isn’t quite accurate, since the ‘peace process’ is <em>itself</em> a form of formaldehyde, intended to maintain the diplomatic <em>status quo</em> while enabling continued entrenchment of the occupation on the ground. </p>
  <p>Netanyahu’s desire to launch a new round of ‘peace talks’, then, is  explicable as a continuation of a long-running Israeli strategy to  reduce the diplomatic costs of continued occupation, and as a response  to the unusual level of international criticism directed at Israel  following the Gaza massacre and the attack on the Gaza Freedom  flotilla. “So what is Israel actually trying to achieve?”, asks <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/mess-report/israel-policy-allows-settlers-to-rampage-unchecked-1.264554" target="_blank">Avi Issacharoff</a>.</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Basically, nothing. There is a superficial peace  process which is going nowhere but eases international pressure on  Israel to reach a deal with the Palestinians”. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><strong>Better than nothing?</strong></p>
  <p>Despite widespread cynicism about this latest round of talks, there  is an attitude, particularly prevalent among liberal Obama supporters,  that despite their low probability of success they are nonetheless  worth supporting on the basis that they are, after all, ‘better than  nothing’. As <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/16889251?story_id=16889251&#038;fsrc=rss" target="_blank">an <em>Economist</em> article</a> puts it, </p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Whether Mr Obama is trying to solve the conflict or  simply to manage it is hard to say, since the secret of “managing” is  to maintain the pretence that the peace process will indeed one day  produce. Either way, it cannot be a bad thing to get old enemies to  talk”. </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>This approach is misguided, for reasons that should already be  clear. The ‘peace process’ should be understood as an attempt to  consolidate and facilitate, rather than end, Israeli occupation. It <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/opinion/29abunimah.html" target="_blank">“allows Israel to pose as a willing peacemaker while carrying on with business as usual”</a>.  Participating in the charade does indeed improve the chances that the  ‘peace talks’ will “succeed”, but “success” in this context represents  a <em>setback</em> for anyone seeking a genuine negotiated settlement to the conflict.</p>
  <p>Furthermore, as Gideon Levy points out, there is always the risk (a  small one, in my view, but certainly not one worth being complacent  about) that a collapse in negotiations will herald another round of  bloodshed. Moreover, launching another diplomatic process from which  Hamas is pointedly excluded <a href="http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/1013/re52.htm" target="_blank">“spells the demise of any serious dialogue between Fatah and Hamas”</a>. <em>Reuters </em><a href="http://reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/MMAO-88NGQB?OpenDocument&#038;rc=3&#038;cc=pse" target="_blank">reports</a> that</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“Western diplomats believe efforts to reconcile Hamas  and Fatah will be off the agenda entirely for the 12-month duration of  negotiations.” </p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Indeed, the Obama admin apparently views the talks as a method of <a href="http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/08/20/white_house_direct_talks_are_the_best_way_to_combat_hamas" target="_blank">weakening and isolating Hamas</a>, a continuation of a Bush administration approach that produced (<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/04/gaza200804" target="_blank">deliberately</a>)  internal Palestinian conflict, the administrative separation of Gaza  and the West Bank and a divided, weakened Palestinian polity. All  serious observers of the conflict recognise that a minimum level of  cooperation between Hamas and Fatah is a prerequisite to any serious  attempt at peace. The fact that the Obama admin continues to oppose  this is telling.</p>
  <p>Some people will inevitably continue to believe that Obama, despite  all the evidence and historical precedents to the contrary, genuinely  intends to force Israel to end its rejectionism. Fine. I won’t attempt  to fight the persuasive power of <em>that</em> smile. Instead of  disputing whether Obama – or European governments – will act on their  words, what we should be doing is organising to <em>ensure</em> that they do. As Stephen Walt <a href="http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/08/20/don_t_fall_for_the_hype_the_peace_process_is_still_going_nowhere" target="_blank">puts it</a>,  “if you think I’m being too gloomy, then do the world a favor and prove  me wrong”. ‘Better than nothing’ assumes that ‘nothing’ is the only  alternative. On the eve of the ‘Oslo process’ Haider Abdel-Shafi, head  of the Palestinian delegation to the 1991 Madrid Conference, dismissed  official “negotiations” as “not worth fighting about”. “The critical  issue”, he continued,</p>
  <blockquote>
    <p>“is transforming our own society… We must decide amongst  ourselves to use all our strength and resources to develop our  collective leadership and the democratic institutions which will  achieve our goals and guide us in the future.” (cit. Chomsky, <em>Fateful Triangle</em>, pp. 539-40</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p>Words worth paying attention to, and not only by Palestinians.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/peace-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The show must go on</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-show-must-go-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-show-must-go-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  
    
      
        
          
            
             [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="gmail_quote">
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    <div>
      <div>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p>Published: August 22 2010 19:35 | Last updated: August 22 2010 19:35</p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p>By inviting Israeli and Palestinian leaders to Washington to <a title="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/920300fe-ac79-11df-8582-00144feabdc0.html  CTRL + Click to follow link" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/920300fe-ac79-11df-8582-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">relaunch  direct talks on September 2</a>, the US government has opened the  latest act in the farce of Middle East peace negotiations. So far  devoid even of a script, this piece of theatre risks irrelevance  outside of the US midterm elections.</p>
                        <p>For Barack Obama, whose foreign policy record amounts to little  beyond a premature Nobel prize, the talks are a public relations feat.  His officials only succeeded by leaning heavily on <a title="FT - Abbas faces dilemma on Israel talks, says aide" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0761075e-9a5c-11df-87fd-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Palestinian  president Mahmoud Abbas</a>. The hint of a one-year time limit is a  bone tossed in his direction; inconclusive, never-ending discussions  could do away with what little authority he retains.</p>
                        <p>Not much is likely to come of the talks. Israelâ€™s notional  willingness to put every issue on the table is a fig leaf for  continuing <a title="FT -  Israeli settlements threaten Mideast talks" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e60c4a4-ac7c-11df-8582-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">construction  and evictions in occupied East Jerusalem</a> and the West Bank. What  happens when a partial moratorium expires in September is itself left  open for negotiation. Arab public opinion, understandably, takes no  interest in the talks.</p>
                        <p>More discouraging yet is the lack of a firm agenda for the talks. US  statements carefully declined to define expectations for a final  outcome, though it is clear (as recognised by the 2000 Clinton  parameters and the 2002 Arab League peace plan) what it must involve: a  Palestinian state within 1967 borders subject to marginal land swaps,  and a renunciation of most Palestinian refugeesâ€™ right of return,  against fair compensation. As much is implied by the Middle East  Quartetâ€™s more direct, if coded, statement. But these talks being a  US show, the directorâ€™s seat will have Americaâ€™s name on it, not  the Quartetâ€™s.</p>
                        <p>The US has no excuse for abdicating leadership. It should offer its  blueprint for a solution and firm up the one-year deadline to make it  clear it will not let talks drag on beyond that point. And it should  demand from both parties a commitment to take any final agreement back  to their respective peoples for a referendum. That is a riskier gamble.  But it would help to sidestep obstructionists on all sides â€“ and it  is the only way to bring Hamas on board.</p>
                        <p>All parties should prefer a negotiated outcome â€“ not least Israel,  whose wobbly international legitimacy is its greatest security risk.  State-building under way under <a title="FT - West Bank leader eyes 'home stretch to freedom'" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1064452e-9b32-11df-baaf-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">Salam  Fayyad, Palestinian prime minister</a>, could soon put Palestine in a  position to aim for a declaration of statehood without Israeli  agreement. The final curtain for the theatrics may not be far away.</p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <p><a href="http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright" target="_blank">Copyright</a> The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article  tools. Please don&#8217;t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email  or post to the web.</p>
                    <br />
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-show-must-go-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth behind the &#8220;Peace Process&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-truth-behind-the-peace-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-truth-behind-the-peace-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  
    
      
        
          
            
             [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
  <div>
    <div>
      <div>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p>By David Gardner </p>
              <p>Published: August 25 2010 22:46 | Last updated: August 25 2010 22:46</p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p><img alt="Ingram Pinn illustration" src="http://media.ft.com/cms/12fb3786-b070-11df-8c04-00144feabdc0.jpg" height="285" width="470"></p>
              <p>As the caravans of Middle East  peace negotiators rumble into Washington next week for the umpteenth  time, the pervasive cynicism and sense of deja vu all over again is  overwhelming – and with good reason.</p>
              <p>The Middle East peace process long ago turned into a tortured  charade of pure process while events on the ground – in particular the  relentless and strategic Israeli colonisation of occupied Palestinian  land – pull in the opposite direction to peace. “We have all been  colluding in a gigantic confidence trick,” is how one Arab minister  puts it, “and here we go again.”</p>
              <p>While many factors had combined to hand veto powers to rejectionists  on both sides, the heart of the question remains the continuing Israeli  occupation. It is essential to remember that the biggest single  increase of Jewish settlers on Arab land – a 50 per cent rise – took  place in 1992-96 under the governments of peace-makers Yitzhak Rabin  and Shimon Peres at the high-water mark of the Oslo peace accords. Many  Israelis will point to the perfidy of the late Yassir Arafat, who  wanted to talk peace but keep the option of armed resistance  dangerously in play. But what killed Oslo was the occupation. The  second intifada that erupted a decade ago was essentially the Oslo war.</p>
              <p>A decade on, the Israeli settlement enterprise has turned the  occupied West Bank into a discontiguous scattering of cantons, walled  in by a security barrier built on yet more annexed Arab land and  criss-crossed by segregated Israeli roads linking the settlements. Last  month, B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights group, published a study  showing Israel has now taken 42 per cent of the West Bank, with 300,000  settlers there and another 200,000 in East Jerusalem. The siege of Gaza  has turned that sliver of land into a vast, open-air prison.</p>
              <p>The main feature of the present situation is the disconnect between  the high politics of the utterly discredited peace process and these –  in Israeli parlance – “facts on the ground”.</p>
              <p>At last month’s White House summit, where Barack Obama and Benjamin  Netanyahu massaged their long estrangement into a political armistice,  the US president praised the Israeli prime minister as a leader  “willing to take risks for peace”.</p>
              <p>But there is no evidence for this whatsoever. True, in June last  year, in response to Mr Obama’s Cairo speech denying any legitimacy to  Israel’s settlements, Mr Netanyahu forced himself to utter the words  “Palestinian state” – but he surrounded them with barbed-wire caveats  that voided them of meaning.</p>
              <p>Indeed, the words all sides use – peace, resolution, security, and  so on – may be the same; but what each side means by them is different.</p>
              <p>The mainstream Palestinian leaders, President Mahmoud Abbas and  Salam Fayyad, the prime minister, and the Quartet made up of the US,  the European Union, the UN and Russia, talk of a negotiated resolution.  This means two states living in peace and security, and a Palestinian  homeland on the 22 per cent of Mandate Palestine taken by Israel in the  1967 Arab-Israeli war. East Jerusalem would serve as the capital of the  West Bank and Gaza, with marginal land swaps to preserve some Israeli  settlements near Jerusalem. But what does Mr Netanyahu mean?</p>
              <p>He has been most clear on what he does not mean. For a start, he has  set his face against any concessions on Jerusalem. He wants to keep  most settlements except for the far-flung “ideological” ones and the  100-plus “outposts” established as pawns to be traded once the chess  game began. His idea of a demilitarised Palestinian state is more like  a sort of supra-municipal administration than a self-determined,  independent government.</p>
              <p>Will he surprise us, on the hackneyed Nixon and China principle that  holds it is politicians of the right who most easily close difficult  deals? There is little to suggest that.</p>
              <p>The thinking of Mr Netanyahu, son of a celebrated promoter of  Greater Israel, has always been profoundly irredentist. While his  nationalist Likud faces the constraints of being in coalition with an  assortment of ultra-rightist and ultra-orthodox parties as well as  Labour, that was plainly his choice; the centrist Kadima party was (and  remains) an alternative. To be fair, Israel’s electoral system – with a  low threshold for entry into the Knesset that makes multi-party  coalitions inevitable – means lobbies such as the settlers can take the  national interest hostage. But Mr Netanyahu magnifies this by his  choice of partners and by diligently firing up the ultra-hawks in the  pro-Israel lobby in the US.</p>
              <p>As risks he has taken for peace, Exhibit A is the much-hyped  moratorium on settlement-building, which expires next month and has, in  any case, been speciously interpreted. While the bulldozers to build  settlements have been idling, moreover, the bulldozers demolishing  Palestinian homes have been roaring: the rate of demolition in and  around Jerusalem has doubled this year, while the army has just razed  the village of al-Farisiye in the Jordan Valley, in line with Mr  Netanyahu’s strategically obsolete obsession with keeping the valley as  Israel’s eastern border.</p>
              <p>As diplomacy struggles to keep alive the viability of a two-state  solution, three rival systems of control have crystallised in the  occupied territories that would make up a future Palestinian homeland:  the settlements; the crimped Palestinian Authority of Mr Abbas and Mr  Fayyad; and then Hamas, which Israel and its Arab and western allies  have tried and failed to marginalise. Time is short for a negotiated  outcome; it may even have run out.</p>
              <p>The outlines of a deal are clear, in the (Bill) Clinton parameters  of 2000 and Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, endorsed by 22 Arab and 57  Muslim countries (as well as Hamas, as part of the 2007 Mecca accord).  There has to be an end to the occupation, and the US and Quartet cannot  just allude to this; they must demand it.</p>
              <p><br />
                <em>The writer is international affairs editor</em></p>
              <p>&#8220;FT&#8221; and &#8220;Financial Times&#8221; are trademarks of the Financial Times. <a href="http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/privacy" target="_blank">Privacy  policy</a> | <a href="http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms" target="_blank">Terms</a><br />
                © Copyright <a href="http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright" target="_blank">The  Financial Times</a> Ltd 2010. </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/the-truth-behind-the-peace-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I support the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/why-i-support-the-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/why-i-support-the-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TJPhA9TGRls?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TJPhA9TGRls?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/why-i-support-the-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess who&#8217;s applying for the Law of Return?</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/guess-whos-applying-for-the-law-of-return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/guess-whos-applying-for-the-law-of-return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DNA study: Hitler had Jewish roots

Belgian researchers examine DNA samples of 39 Hitler relatives, say he had Jewish, African roots

Belgian researchers say they have proof that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler had Jewish and African roots, the British Telegraph reported on Tuesday.

The researchers reached the conclusions after examining saliva samples of 39 of Hitler&#8217;s relatives.
 
Journalist [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[DNA study: Hitler had Jewish roots
<p/>
Belgian researchers examine DNA samples of 39 Hitler relatives, say he had Jewish, African roots
<p/>
Belgian researchers say they have proof that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler had Jewish and African roots, the British Telegraph reported on Tuesday.
<p/>
The researchers reached the conclusions after examining saliva samples of 39 of Hitler&#8217;s relatives.
<p/> 
Journalist Jean-Paul Mulders and historian Marc Vermeeren published their findings in Belgain magazine Knack.
<p/> 
The Sun reported that the two did not directly receive the saliva samples used for their DNA tests from all of Hitler&#8217;s descendants. In one case, they picked up a napkin dropped by a distant Hitler relative currently living in the United States. Other Hitler relatives were located in Austria and asked to hand over DNA samples.
<p/> 
According to the study, the DNA tests discovered a chromosome called Haplogroup E1b1b1, which is considered rare in Western Europe. The researchers noted that this chromosome is very common in North Africa - mostly in Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria - as well as among Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews.
<p/> 
According to the report, the study was undertaken under &#8220;stringent laboratory conditions.&#8221;
<p/>
&#8220;One can from this postulate that Hitler was related to people whom he despised,&#8221; researcher Mulders said]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/guess-whos-applying-for-the-law-of-return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Israel Legalizes Prostitution, High Priced Call Girls Flock to Tel Aviv</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/after-israel-legalizes-prostitution-high-priced-call-girls-flock-to-tel-aviv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/after-israel-legalizes-prostitution-high-priced-call-girls-flock-to-tel-aviv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Israel-Palestine Conflict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To   delegitimize Israel is an affront not only to Israelis, but to those   “everywhere, in every part of humanity, who share the values of a free and   independent human spirit,” Quartet envoy Tony Blair said on Tuesday, in an exceptionally warm   speech at the Interdisciplinary Center in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<font face="Arial" size="2">To   delegitimize Israel is an affront not only to Israelis, but to those   “everywhere, in every part of humanity, who share the values of a free and   independent human spirit,” Quartet envoy <a href="http://jpost.headup.com/topic/Tony_Blair" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">Tony Blair</font></a> said on Tuesday, in an exceptionally warm   speech at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya.<br />
<br />
Blair, the keynote   speaker at a conference on the delegitimization of Israel, said the best answer   to those who sought to delegitimize the Jewish state “lies in the character of   Israel itself, in the openness, fairmindedness and creativity of the   Israelis.”<br />
<br />
“My advice,” he said, “is to guide that spirit and keep it.”   Blair, who will be taking part in the launch of direct talks between Israel and   the Palestinian Authority in Washington next week, said the last 60 years had   been “remarkable for you, but what you have created is a remarkable example for   the rest of us.”<br />
<br />
In discussing the steps Israel needed to take to combat   delegitimization efforts, the former British prime minister said it “should   always be a staunch and unremitting advocate and actor for peace. What I mean by   this is not simply that Israel should want peace, it should advocate it and act   to achieve it.”<br />
<br />
The negotiations conducted under the <a href="http://jpost.headup.com/topic/Ehud_Olmert" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">Olmert</font></a> government “played an immensely important part   in showing the world that whatever else they might say, they have to accept that   the government of Israel was genuinely trying to bring about peace,” Blair   said.<br />
<br />
Likewise, he said, “the restart of direct negotiations to be   launched next week is important. It is important in itself, and it is important   in that it shows that Prime Minister [Binyamin] Netanyahu, on behalf of the new   government of Israel, is an advocate of peace.”<br />
<br />
Blair said the one-year   time frame placed on the talks was also important because it indicated there was   “a simple and sincere yearning on the part of the people” for peace with the   Palestinians.<br />
<br />
“I know some are cynical about the process,” he   said.<br />
<br />
“I know some say it is all for show. I reject that view.I think   that if Israel can receive real and effective guarantees about its security,   then it is willing and ready to conclude negotiations for a viable independent   Palestinian state. This is a brave decision by the prime minister, and a right   one to engage in the negotiations.”<br />
<br />
Blair also said that Israel should   deal with legitimate criticism, and one such piece of legitimate criticism was   that more could and should be done to improve the daily life of the   Palestinians.<br />
<br />
These improvements would not only help the Palestinians, he   said, but also dilute “the most potent fuel, especially in the Arab media,” for   the claim that the Palestinians are not only suffering injustice, but also a   form of humiliation.<br />
<br />
“Dignity is a very important concept,” Blair   said.<br />
<br />
“Consistent with security, Israel should constantly be looking for   ways to compensate for the indignity which inevitably results sometimes from   security measures, and should seek to avoid any unnecessary   indignity.”<br />
<br />
There were two forms of the delegitimization of Israel, Blair   said. The first was “traditional, obvious and, from certain quarters, expected,”   and came from those who openly attacked Israel’s right to exist. Pointing to   Iranian President <a href="http://jpost.headup.com/topic/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad" target="_blank"><font color="#000000">Mahmoud Ahmadinejad</font></a> as an example, he said that his   form of delegitimization – calling for Israel to be wiped off the map – was   easier to deal with “because it is so clear.” <br />
<br />
The more pernicious form,   however, was not as open, and came from those who were unwilling to recognize   that Israel had a legitimate point of view, Blair said.<br />
<br />
“The issue of   delegitimization is not simply about an overt denial of Israel’s right to exist.   It is the advocating of prejudice in not allowing that Israel has a point of   view that should be listened to,” he asserted.<br />
<br />
Blair said that “a   consistent conversation I have with some, but by no means all, of my European   colleagues, is to argue not to apply rules to the government of Israel that they   would never dream of applying to their own governments or their own   countries.”</font>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/after-israel-legalizes-prostitution-high-priced-call-girls-flock-to-tel-aviv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Song of the Day: Die Gedanken sind frei/Thoughts are free:</title>
		<link>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/song-of-the-day-die-gedanken-sind-freithoughts-are-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/song-of-the-day-die-gedanken-sind-freithoughts-are-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pilias</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/?p=3762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M53mpCOAfS4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M53mpCOAfS4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/song-of-the-day-die-gedanken-sind-freithoughts-are-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
