Bosnia presidents 'cannot agree' on UN bid

October 29, 2011

In News

Transmitted below is a news report on the current confusion within the three-headed presidency of Bosnia & Herzegovina, one of the nine current members of the UN Security Council which have extended diplomatic recognition to the State of Palestine and the only one of these states whose affirmative vote in favor of Palestine’s membership application is not assured.
If neither France nor Portugal nor the United Kingdom dares to defy the Israeli-American diktat and vote in favor of Palestine and a “two-state solution”, it is the Bosnian vote which will determine whether the United States needs to “veto” Palestine’s membership application in order to defeat it and whether the West will present a united rejection front against Palestine, with all of the consequences likely to flow from such a dramatic manifestation of Western contempt for the Arab and Muslim worlds and the overwhelming majority of mankind.

Bosnia presidents ‘cannot agree’ on UN bid

Published 28/10/2011

Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman (L) shakes hands with Chairman of Tripartite Bosnia Presidency Zeljko Komsic (C) and member of the Presidency Bakir Izetbegovic during a visit to Sarajevo on Oct. 27, 2011. Lieberman is believed to be in Bosnia to lobby the authorities against supporting a Palestinian bid for an independent state in the United Nations Security Council, in which Bosnia is a non-permanent member, according to local media. (REUTERS/Dado Ruvic)

SARAJEVO (Reuters) — Bosnia’s trio of presidents said on Thursday they could not agree on whether to support a Palestinian bid for full UN membership, with Sarajevo potentially holding a key vote in the UN Security Council.

Bosnia’s presidency has been shared by leaders of its Muslim, Croat and Serb communities since its 1992-95 war.

In a statement after meeting Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman in Sarajevo, the triumvirate said it had so far been unable to reach a joint position on the Palestinian application, reflecting the country’s own ethnic divisions.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki is expected to arrive in Sarajevo on Friday to ask for Bosnia’s vote as a temporary member of the Security Council and the admissions committee currently discussing the issue.

Given the constellation of Security Council members, Bosnia’s vote could be key and potentially force a promised veto by the United States. Thursday’s statement meant Sarajevo would likely abstain.

“The presidency of Bosnia-Herzegovina does not have a single view about the issue, while such decisions must be taken through consensus,” the presidency statement quoted chairman Zeljko Komsic, a Croat, as saying.

“Bosnia-Herzegovina, as a country which has been through the hell of war, cares very much that all open issues should be resolved with great patience and wisdom, because this is the only path to a sustainable peace,” Komsic added.

The Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) presidency member, Bakir Izetbegovic, expressed his strong support for the Palestinian cause, while Serb member Nebojsa Radmanovic said he was opposed to unilateral action and supported direct talks between the two sides, according to the statement.

The Palestinian application for UN membership, submitted by President Mahmoud Abbas on Sept. 23, is expected to be dealt with by Security Council ambassadors on or around Nov. 11, according to diplomatic sources.

Bosnian Muslims are sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, with Palestine the first to recognize Bosnia as an independent country when it split from the former Yugoslav federation in 1992.

Lieberman openly lobbied Serbs in Bosnia’s autonomous Serb republic last summer, when he spent a week of his holiday in the main town Banja Luka, promising investment and financial support to the impoverished region.